Future Identities

Recently I stumbled upon a report called Future Identities in the UK. The purpose of the report is to provide the government in the UK insight into how identities of citizens will develop over the next 10 years. But the insight certainly also applies to how private companies will have to react to this development and certainly also not just in the UK.

The report talks about three different kinds of identities:

identies in the UK

Applied to data quality and master data management I think these future kinds of identities will have these consequences:

Biometric identities relates to hard core identity resolution as in fighting terrorism, crime investigation and physical access control but is sometimes even used in simple commercial checks as told in the post Real World Identity. My guess is that we will see biometrics used more as a mean to have better data quality, but not considerable more due to return of investment also as examined in the post Citizen ID and Biometrics.

Biographical identities and the related attributes resembles what we often also calls demographic attributes used in handling data for direct marketing and other purposes of data management. Direct marketing may, as reported in the post Psychographic Data Quality, be in transition to go deeper into big data in order to be psychographic marketing.

Social identities is the new black. As discussed on this blog, latest in the post Defining Social MDM, my guess is that social data master management is going to be big and has to be partly interwoven with using traditional biographical attributes and even, like it or not, biometric attributes. The art of doing that in a proper way is going to be very exciting.

Bookmark and Share

Multi-Entity MDM vs Multidomain MDM

puzzleOn the upcoming MDM Summit Europe 2013 in London this April you will be able to learn about Multi-Entity MDM as well as Multi-Domain MDM.

So, what is the difference between Multi-Entity MDM and Multi-Domain MDM?

To my knowledge it is two terms having the same meaning. It is doing the two main preceding disciplines for MDM being Customer Data Integration (CDI) and Product Information Management (PIM) at the same time presumably using the same software brand.

Multi-Entity MDM was probably the first term used and still used by The MDM Institute while Multidomain MDM is used by Gartner (the analyst firm) and most tool vendors today. For example Stibo Systems is focusing on mutidomain recently in this press release about latest achievements.

Talking about Gartner and the vendor crowd Gartner analyst Andrew White wrote a blog post the other day: Round-Up of Master Data Management (MDM) 2012, and looking forward to 2013.

Herein White bashes the vendors by saying:

“Vendor hype related to multidomain …. continued to be far in excess of reality”.

What do you think? Is Andrew White right about that? And what about Multi-Entity MDM, is that any better?

Bookmark and Share

While we are waiting for the LEI

As told in the post Business Entity Identifiers there has been a new global numbering system for business entities on the way for some time. The wonder is called LEI (Legal Entity Identifier).

fsb-leiThe implementation work has been adapted by the Financial Stability Board. The latest developments are reported in a publication called Fifth progress note on the Global LEI Initiative.

Surely, while the implementations may be in good hands, the set up doesn’t give hope for a speedy process where every legal entity in the world in a short time will have a LEI.

And then the next question will be how long it will take before organizations will have enriched existing databases with that LEI and implemented on-boarding processes where a LEI is captured with every new insertion of party master data describing a legal entity.

A good way to start to be prepared will be to implement features in on-boarding business processes where available external reference data are captured when new party entities are added to your databases. Having best available information about names, addresses and business entity identifiers available today and a culture of capturing such information will be a great starting point.

And oh, the instant Data Quality concept is precisely all about doing that.

Bookmark and Share

Defining Social MDM

Social MDM2Social Master Data Management (Social MDM) has been a recurring subject on this blog for a couple of years. But what is Social MDM? What do others say it is?

Here is what Techopedia, Gartner and The MDM Institute thinks:

Techopedia has this definition of Social MDM:

Definition – What does Social Master Data Management (Social MDM) mean?

Social master data management (Social MDM) refers to the processes, policies and concepts used to gather and compile social media data sources – like Facebook, LinkedIn and Twitter – into one master file.

Gartner (the analyst firm) hasn’t to my knowledge used the term Social MDM. In 2011 they though said that this will be one of three main trends in MDM:

Increasing Links Between MDM and Social Networks

By 2015, 15 percent of organizations will have added social media data about their customers to the customer master data attributes they manage in their MDM systems….

In 2012, as reported in the post The Big MDM Trend, Gartner, The Hype Cycle firm, changed the point to be about MDM and Big Data.

The MDM Institute has a Field Report from April 2012 where Aaron Zornes (who is the MDM institute) writes:

Social MDM (Cloud-enablement, Architecture & Integration)

During 2012, cloud-enabled MDM will attract small- and mid-sized businesses as a means to engage in MDM without committing to long-term project and major expense….

By 2014-15, cloud-innate services for data quality and Data Governance will be more prevalent than full Social MDM…

So the MDM institute thinks Social MDM is MDM in the cloud.

What do you think?

Bookmark and Share

The Letter Å

I have previously written about the letter Æ and the letter Ø. Now it’s time to write about another letter in Scandinavian alphabets that doesn’t belong to the English alphabet: The letter Å which is å in lower case.

When transliterated to the English alphabet Å becomes AA and å becomes aa. When a name begins with Å it becomes Aa. For example the second largest city in Denmark was called Århus being Aarhus in English. Actually the city council by 1st January 2011, as reported here, changed the name of the city to Aarhus.

AarhusThe Master Data Management tool vendor Stibo Systems has it’s headquarter in an Aarhus suburban. As Stibo was founded in 1794 the company has stayed in Århus some of its life.

The term Master Data Management (MDM) wasn’t known in 1794 and IT wasn’t invented then. Stibo is basically a printing company who became a specialist in making catalogues, later electronic catalogues and the software for doing this, which led to being a Product Information Management (PIM) vendor and now a multi-domain MDM solution provider. By the way: å is pronounced as the o in catalogue. Catalåg.

Bookmark and Share

Making Data Quality Gangnam Style

The 21st December 2012 wasn’t the end of the world. But it was the day a music video for the first time passed one billion views on YouTube. It has been said that a reason for this success for Gangnam Style was that the Korean pop singer PSY hasn’t pursued any copyrights related to the video. But that doesn’t mean that PSY doesn’t earn money from the video. On the contrary related commercials are making money Gangnam Style.

A hindrance for better data quality by better real world alignment has traditionally been lack of free and open reference data.  Some issues has been availability and heavy price tags on government collected data.

In my current daily work I mostly use such data within the United Kingdom and Denmark. And here the authorities are taking different paths.

The prices on UK public reference data has traditionally been fairly high and there’s certainly room for innovation around open government data as reported on DataQualityPro in the post Introduction to the Open Data User Group UK.

In Denmark the 21st December 2012 was the day it was published that a unanimous parliament had agreed on the laws behind having Free and Open Public Sector Master Data. From the 1st January 2013 there are no price tags on reference data about addresses, properties, companies (and citizens) and there are plans for making those data even more available, consistent and timely.

Great news for data quality, Gangnam Style.

Data Quality Gangnam Style

Bookmark and Share

The New Year in Identity Resolution

identity resolutionYou may divide doing identity resolution into these categories:

  • Hard core identity check
  • Light weight real world alignment
  • Digital identity resolution

Hard Core Identity Check

Some business processes requires a solid identity check. This is usually the case for example for credit approval and employment enrolment. Identity check is also part of criminal investigation and fighting terrorism.

Services for identity checks vary from country to country because of different regulations and different availability of reference data.

An identity check usually involves the entity who is being checked.

Light Weight Real World Alignment

In data quality improvement and Master Data Management (MDM) you often include some form of identity resolution in order to have your data aligned with the real world. For example when evaluating the result of a data matching activity with names and addresses, you will perform a lightweight identity resolution which leads to marking the matched results as true or false positives.

Doing such kind of identity resolution usually doesn’t involve the entity being examined.

Digital Identity Resolution

Our existence has increasingly moved to the online world. As discussed in the post Addressing Digital Identity this means that we also will need means to include digital identity into traditional identity resolution.

There are of course discussions out there about how far digital identity resolution should be possible. For example real name policy enforcement in social networks is indeed a hot topic.

Future Trends

With regard to digital identity resolution the jury is still out. In my eyes we can’t avoid that the economic consequences of the rising social sphere will affect the demand for knowing who is out there. Also the opportunities in establishing identity via digital footprints will be exploited.

My guess is that the distinction between hard core identity check and real world alignment in data quality improvement and MDM will disappear as reference data will become more available and the price of reference data will go down.

That’s why I’m right now working with a solution (www.instantdq.com) that combines identity check features and data universe into master data management with the possibility of adding digital identity into the mix.

Bookmark and Share

Doing Census versus doing Master Data Management

“In those days Caesar Augustus issued a decree that a census should be taken of the entire Roman world. This was the first census that took place while Quirinius was governor of Syria. And everyone went to their own town to register.”

These are the famous words from the Gospel According to Luke that you, if you belong to the part of the world where Christianity is practiced, hear every Christmas.

Today scholars don’t think that there actually was a census for the whole Roman Empire but there are evidences that a local census in Syria and Judea took place around year 1. This was in order to collect taxes in those provinces. As you know: The taxman is data quality’s best friend.

Today doing census is still the most practiced method of knowing about the people living in a given country. The alternative is a public registry that is constantly updated with all the information needed about you. I had the chance to describe such a method in the post on a Canadian blog some years ago. The post is called How Denmark does it.

India has a similar scheme with a centralized citizen registry on the go. This program is called Aadhaar.

As reported in the post Citizen ID and Biometrics the United Kingdom was close to adapting doing citizen Master Data Management some years ago. But it didn’t happen, so it’s still possible to have multiple names and multiple addresses at the same time in different registries while Cameron is Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, First Lord of the Treasury and Minister for the Civil Service.

Merry Christmas.

going to census

Bookmark and Share

Four Reasons for Getting Social with MDM

Social Master Data Management (Social MDM) is about linking the increasing trend of doing business via social media using what we may call “systems of engagement” with the traditional way of supporting business using what we call “systems of record”.

Engaging Human Resources

Creating systems for sharing knowledge between employees within your organization and not at least sharing what knowledge exists among employees has been around for long. Such systems rely on a basic employee master data foundation typically based on core employee registries made for employee contract and payroll functionality.

In a modern organization human resource administration is affected by the way work and live today. Doing work may be done in many other ways than through a traditional employee contract and we are increasingly moving between branches in different countries with different payroll systems often leading to assigning the same individual a complete new identity as a human resource.

Managing employee and other human resource master data will have to embrace this reality in order to ensure effective use of the human resources available and making it possible for all your human resources to help with that will be a big help.

Social MDMFollowing Your Customer’s Digital Footprint

The growth of social networks during the recent years has been almost unbelievable. A lot of activity takes place within social networks and some of this activity relates to buying, recommending and using your products and services and your competitors’ products and services.

Your ability to follow your customer’s and prospective customer’s footprint in the social networks, and other big data sources, will, if not today, be a competitive advantage tomorrow.

You will make the most out of this if you are able to link your traditional collection of customer transactions with the footprints of the customer in the social world. That link will have to be made in a master data hub.

Supporting Complex Sales

Doing social MDM is as a natural consequence of adapting social CRM (Social Customer Relation Management). Many CRM systems are supporting B2B (Business-to Business) activities helping with keeping track of what’s going on with a lot of contacts related to a business account.

Traditional MDM has been much about a single view of the business account and the legal entity behind. As social CRM is much about the relations to the business contacts, the people side of business, we need a solid master data foundation behind the people being those contacts.

The same individual may in fact be an important influencer related to a range of business accounts being the legal entity with who you are aiming for a sales contract. You need a single view of that. So many sales contracts are based on a relation to a buyer moving from one business account to another. You need to be the winner in that game and the answer to that may very well be your ability to do better social MDM.

Sharing Product Data

Product master data are often reborn many times. This happens inside organizations and it happens in the ecosystem of business partners in supply chains encompassing manufactures, distributors, retailers and end users.

Inside an organization it may happen that the purchase function enters a product description fit for the purpose of handling procurement. But this description may not fit the purpose of appreciating and describing the product in the selling process if it’s a resell product or service or it doesn’t fit the engineering process if it’s a spare part or a tool.

As a supplier of products and services through selling channels you are interested in that your descriptions, images and stories around products and services are consistent and timely.

Optimizing Product Information Management (PIM) for multiple purposes requires sharing product data both inside the organization and with your suppliers and customers. In doing that you need that side of social MDM we may call social PIM.

Bookmark and Share

Rising Adoption of MDM in the Cloud

When I back in December 2011 had a look into 2012 and what I was going to do, the topics were very well aligned with what Gartner (the analyst firm) have predicted for MDM, being:

What for me turned out to go faster than I thought was the thing about rising adoption of MDM in the Cloud.

I remember from back when CRM in the Cloud started to grow, not at least driven by the success of Salesforce.com, many voices predicted a slow adoption as most people couldn’t believe that companies would put one of their best secrets, the customer database, up in the cloud where everyone may be able to have a look.

iDQ logoRight now I’m working with implementing my first cloud MDM solution. This solution is based on the instant Data Quality service, which now consequently has an MDM edition. We didn’t expected to be this far already, but here we are.

Bookmark and Share