In the Master Data Management (MDM) and Product Information Management (PIM) space there are some analyst market reports with vendor rankings used by organizations when doing a tool selection project.
These reports are based on the analyst’s survey at their customers and perhaps other end user organizations as well as the analysts research in corporation with the solution vendor. However, sometimes the latter part does not happen.
One example was the Gartner late 2017 Magic Quadrant for MDM solutions where IBM declined to participate as reported in the post Why IBM Declined to Participate in The Gartner MDM Magic Quadrant.
Another example is the Forrester and Informatica dysfunctional relationship. In the Forrester 2019 MDM Wave it is stated that “Informatica declined to participate in our research”. This was also apparent in the Forrester 2018 PIM Wave where Forrester’s placement of Informatica as a Germany-based vendor didn’t reflect movements (and perhaps achievements) since 2012 as told in the post MDM Alternative Facts.
Both Gartner and Forrester have though positioned IBM and Informatica in their plot with the note that the research did not include interaction with the vendor.
Information Difference has taken another approach and does not include nonparticipating vendors as discussed in the post Movements in the MDM Vendor Landscape 2019.
This challenge is a bit close to me as I am running a list of MDM / PIM / DQM vendors where there now also is a ranking service based on individual context, scope and requirements. Here I have chosen to include vendor solutions on the three above analyst reports and the list itself as noted in select your solution step 4.